|
|
Post by zacharack on Sept 8, 2005 3:17:42 GMT -5
I know the hurricane happened over a week ago and completely demolished New Orleans. However, it's still a story dominating the headlines and likely will for weeks to come.
My question to you is, which news organization and news anchor/reporter do you think is covering the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina (and if you remember the actual hurricane coverage) the best?
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Sept 8, 2005 4:26:54 GMT -5
The CBC.
ROTFLMAO! Get back to the bargaining table and start airing Hockey Night in Canada like you're supposed to.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tim on Sept 8, 2005 18:43:26 GMT -5
I would say CNN or CNBC, actually. They've got reporters all over the place, and their reports are actually consistent and full of valid content.
OT: Does anybody have the theme music from CNBC's news programming (ie. Power Lunch, Closing Bell, Wake Up Call etc)?
|
|
|
|
Post by Yours on Sept 8, 2005 18:52:56 GMT -5
Or what about the music that CNN uses...
|
|
|
|
Post by I Miss BCTV on Sept 8, 2005 19:25:20 GMT -5
Or what about the music that CNN uses... CNN uses Dark Skies by Videohelper for its Hurricane Coverage. |
|
|
|
Post by TRENT310 on Sept 8, 2005 21:14:50 GMT -5
4-WWL has the best coverage, in my opinion. 5-WKRG had good coverage but they don't do that anymore, as I see today.
|
|
|
|
Post by viewer on Sept 16, 2005 15:36:58 GMT -5
You have access to WWL-TV? Just like George W. Bush, I am days behind to respond to the Katrina (thread). For one week, WWL-TV was broadcast from an educational institute from Baton Rouge, LA by broadcast students. (Zack S. can't make a joke here). WWL-TV provided almost 7 days of continous coverage. Regular programming resumed on the evening of September 6th.
|
|
|
|
Post by TRENT310 on Sept 18, 2005 12:25:02 GMT -5
Well my realtime video overlaying computer (which has a TV out card) has access to the internet, so I can just view the internet stream and send it through the house, on the unused cable channels 60-69. It makes much more sense to do it on unused channels than buy 80 something RF Translators and shift the 'real' cable channels down a few notches.
|
|
|
|
Post by viewer on Sept 19, 2005 18:06:06 GMT -5
Well my realtime video overlaying computer (which has a TV out card) has access to the internet, so I can just view the internet stream and send it through the house, on the unused cable channels 60-69. It makes much more sense to do it on unused channels than buy 80 something RF Translators and shift the 'real' cable channels down a few notches. How are you doing that? |
|
|
|
Post by TRENT310 on Sept 19, 2005 21:12:08 GMT -5
Well my realtime video overlaying computer (which has a TV out card) has access to the internet, so I can just view the internet stream and send it through the house, on the unused cable channels 60-69. It makes much more sense to do it on unused channels than buy 80 something RF Translators and shift the 'real' cable channels down a few notches. How are you doing that? Whaddymean how am I doing that? I'm receiving the signal on the computer, which goes through an RF modulator and a translator to bounce it onto channel 63. Easy. |
|
